Studies of effects produced by water samples upon human functional state

On the basis of “ZASHCHITA” Disaster Relief Medicine Center, an experiment was performed to identify impact produced by under-test water samples upon human functional state. To evaluate such impact, Folle-Nakatani methods were applicable. Such methods enable researchers to evaluate, in reliance upon conductivity of the biologically active areas, functionality (bioenergy) levels – both of any individual organs or systems and of the whole organism. With use of such methods, it becomes possible to find out what are specific effects produced upon human health by various external factors, including drugs and foodstuffs. The methods are essentially underlain with Riodoraku’s theory further developed by Nakatani, which says that there is a close relationship between the functional state of internal organs and electric conductivity of channels corresponding to the classical 12 meridians of Chinese medicine.

The selected methods were employed with use of “DIACOMS” Diagnostic Computer System authorized for practical use by Russian Ministry for Health, Committee for New Medical Equipment (Minutes No. 5 dd. September 11, 1992) and recommended for implementation at all levels of health care & medical science system by Russian Ministry for Health Letter No. 05-16/10-16 dd. March 23, 1993.

The following three water samples were selected for tests:

1. Sample W – water sample taken out of Moscow City Western Administrative Circuit water supply system;
2. Sample F – water sample put through a purification system by reverse osmosis method with a nanomembrane used at one of the purification cascades. Sample W was the source of water for the purification system. Water purification household system (Series: EE-RO-6PF, manufacturer: ZEPTER) was used as the purification appliance during the tests;
3. Sample T – water sample obtained through treatment of Sample F with Aquator field generator

To make the experiment, a group of ten people (four women and six men) was selected randomly. The subjects were between twenty eight and seventy five years of age. In all of the subjects, the background functionality levels were determined, after which they had to take two hundred milliliters of water, and, each five minutes within an hour to follow, readings were taken of changes in their bioenergy.

As example of data obtained, results of functional measuring taken in one of the subjects (a man of fifty six) are stated below. Each of the charts provides an idea of the functional state of each of the twelve systems in human organism. Data stated in the chart (from the left to the right) are descriptive of the state of the following organs and systems:

• Lungs (Ë);
• Cardio-Vascular system (ÑÑ);
• Heart (Ñ);
• Small Intestine (Òí);
• Lymphatic System (ËÑ);
• Large Intestine (Òê);
• Pancreas – Spleen (ÏÑ);
• Liver (Ïí);
• Kidneys (Ïê);
• Urinal & Genital system (ÌÏ);
• Gall Bladder (ÆÏ);
• Stomach (Æ).

Each organ was described by way of two parameters (Ë and Ï) corresponding to the state its left-side energy channel and right-side energy channel were in.

Under the used methods, each organism is considered to be functioning normally if rates obtained for all organs (such rates being as stated along the vertical axis) are within the so-called normal corridor (60-100 Conventional Units). 80 Units are assumed as the optimal rate. The overall state of the organism can also be described with use of such integral parameter as the average functionality level (the average of all rates, which have been obtained for all systems and organs), which – in case the organism is functioning normally – should also be within the normal corridor.

All subjects of the experiment (without any exceptions) showed similar responses to under-test water samples. Use of Sample F produced a large reduction in the average functionality levels, as shown in the consolidated diagram. The horizontal axis shows time (in minutes) of the tests, and the vertical axis shows average functionality levels (in Conventional Units). In case of exposure to Sample F (as shown in the example) the average functionality level falls lower than 40 Conventional Units, which is two times less than the optimal level. If rates such as these are applicable to the state of any organism, this is an evidence of a severe pathology. On the contrary, Sample T acted to stabilize the bioenergy by bringing it to its optimal level.

Diagram: changes in the functional state exposed to

Sample W	Sample F	Sample T
Background state. T = 0 min.
Average level: 83	Average level: 78	Average level: 89
Measuring No. 1. T = 5 min.
Average level: 56	Average level: 74	Average level: 79
Measuring No. 2. T = 10 min.
Average level: 60	Average level: 60	Average level: 72
Measuring No. 3. T = 15 min.
Average level: 74	Average level: 52	Average level: 72
Measuring No. 4. T = 20 min.
Average level: 68	Average level: 42	Average level: 77
Measuring No. 5. T = 25 min.
Average level: 75	Average level: 46	Average level: 75
Measuring No. 6. T = 30 min.
Average level: 69	Average level: 42	Average level: 75
Measuring No. 7. T = 35 min.
Average level: 65	Average level: 42	Average level: 75
Measuring No. 8. T = 40 min.
Average level: 71	Average level: 37	Average level: 73
Measuring No. 9. T = 45 min.
Average level: 73	Average level: 39	Average level: 88
Measuring No. 10. T = 50 min.
Average level: 73	Average level: 40	Average level: 80
Measuring No. 11. T = 55 min.
Average level: 68	Average level: 37	Average level: 78
Measuring No. 12. T = 60 min.
Average level: 63	Average level: 37	Average level: 80
Charts: average levels of
Sample W	Sample F	Sample T

Consolidated chart: average levels

Results obtained show that Sample F is depressive for human physiology. The reason for this is the set of physical properties typical for molecules of the under-test water, which, in its physical formula, is biologically incompatible. On the contrary, Sample T, having properties similar to those of water contained in living cells, is capable to stabilize human functionality levels.